|
|
CONTENTS |
SPECIAL ISSUE ON RECURRENCE
|
|
Overall management
Prognosis and outcome
Recurrence
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Berney DM, Wheeler TM, Grignon DJ, Epstein JI, Griffiths DF, Humphrey PA,
van der Kwast T, Montironi R, Delahunt B, Egevad L, Srigley JR; ISUP
Prostate Cancer Group.
International
Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and
Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 4: seminal
vesicles and lymph nodes.
Mod
Pathol. 2011 Jan;24(1):39-47. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2010.160. Epub
2010 Sep 3.
Abstract | Full text | Related
citations
|
|
Egevad L, Srigley JR, Delahunt B.
International
Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on handling and
staging of radical prostatectomy specimens: rationale and organization.
Mod
Pathol. 2011 Jan;24(1):1-5. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2010.159. Epub
2010 Aug 27.
Abstract | Full text | Related
citations
|
|
Magi-Galluzzi C, Evans AJ, Delahunt B, Epstein JI, Griffiths DF, van der
Kwast TH, Montironi R, Wheeler TM, Srigley JR, Egevad LL, Humphrey PA; ISUP
Prostate Cancer Group.
International
Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and
Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 3: extraprostatic
extension, lymphovascular invasion and locally advanced disease.
Mod
Pathol. 2011 Jan;24(1):26-38. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2010.158. Epub
2010 Aug 27.
Abstract | Full text | Related
citations
|
|
Samaratunga H, Montironi R, True L, Epstein JI, Griffiths DF, Humphrey PA,
van der Kwast T, Wheeler TM, Srigley JR, Delahunt B, Egevad L; ISUP Prostate
Cancer Group.
International
Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and
Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 1: specimen
handling.
Mod
Pathol. 2011 Jan;24(1):6-15. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2010.178. Epub
2010 Sep 10.
Abstract | Full text | Related
citations
|
|
Tan PH, Cheng L, Srigley JR, Griffiths D, Humphrey PA, van der Kwast TH,
Montironi R, Wheeler TM, Delahunt B, Egevad L, Epstein JI; ISUP Prostate
Cancer Group.
International
Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and
Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 5: surgical
margins.
Mod
Pathol. 2011 Jan;24(1):48-57. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2010.155. Epub
2010 Aug 20.
Abstract | Full text | Related
citations
|
|
The Royal College of Pathologists of Australia
ICCR
Prostate Cancer (Radical Prostatectomy) bookmarked guide
2011 http://www.rcpa.edu.au/Library/Practising-Pathology/ICCR/Cancer-Datasets.
Abstract
| Full
text
|
|
van der Kwast TH, Amin MB, Billis A, Epstein JI, Griffiths D, Humphrey PA,
Montironi R, Wheeler TM, Srigley JR, Egevad L, Delahunt B; ISUP Prostate
Cancer Group.
International
Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and
Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 2: T2 substaging
and prostate cancer volume.
Mod
Pathol. 2011 Jan;24(1):16-25. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2010.156. Epub
2010 Sep 3.
Abstract | Full text | Related
citations
|
|
|
|
|
Nomograms |
|
Makarov DV, Trock BJ, Humphreys EB, Mangold LA, Walsh PC, Epstein JI, Partin
AW.
Updated
nomogram to predict pathologic stage of prostate cancer given
prostate-specific antigen level, clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason score (Partin
tables) based on cases from 2000 to 2005.
Urology. 2007 Jun;69(6):1095-101.
Abstract
| Full
text | Comment
| Related
citations
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alkhateeb S, Alibhai S, Fleshner N, Finelli A, Jewett M, Zlotta A, Nesbitt
M, Lockwood G, Trachtenberg J.
Impact
of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy differs by disease
risk group.
J Urol. 2010 Jan;183(1):145-50.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.132. Epub 2009 Nov 13.
Abstract
| Related
citations
|
|
Gleason score 7
|
Brimo F, Partin AW, Epstein JI.
Tumor
grade at margins of resection in radical prostatectomy specimens is an
independent predictor of prognosis.
Urology. 2010 Nov;76(5):1206-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.03.090. Epub 2010 Aug 8.
Abstract
| Related
citations
|
|
|
Blute ML, Bostwick DG, Bergstralh EJ, Slezak JM, Martin SK, Amling CL,
Zincke H.
Anatomic
site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its
impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy.
Urology. 1997 Nov;50(5):733-9.
Abstract
| Related
citations
|
|
Cho IC, Kwon WA, Kim JE, Joung JY, Seo HK, Chung J, Park WS, Lee KH.
Prostate
volume has prognostic value only in pathologic T2 radical prostatectomy
specimens.
J Korean Med
Sci. 2011 Jun;26(6):807-13. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2011.26.6.807. Epub
2011 May 18.
Abstract
| Full
text | Related
citations
|
|
Choo MS, Cho SY, Ko K, Jeong CW, Lee SB, Ku JH, Hong SK, Byun SS, Kwak C,
Kim HH, Lee SE, Jeong H.
Impact
of positive surgical margins and their locations after radical
prostatectomy: comparison of biochemical recurrence according to risk
stratification and surgical modality.
World J Urol.
2013 Dec 21. [Epub ahead of print]
Abstract
| Related
citations
|
|
D'Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, Schultz D, Schnall M, Tomaszewski
JE, Wein A.
A
multivariate analysis of clinical and pathological factors that predict for
prostate specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy for prostate
cancer.
J Urol. 1995 Jul;154(1):131-8.
Abstract
| Related
citations
|
|
D'Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, Schnall M, Tomaszewski J, Schultz
D, Kao G, VanArsdalen K, Wein A.
A
multivariable analysis of clinical factors predicting for pathological
features associated with local failure after radical prostatectomy for
prostate cancer.
Int
J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994 Sep 30;30(2):293-302.
Abstract
| Related
citations
|
|
Epstein JI, Carmichael M, Partin AW, Walsh PC.
Is
tumor volume an independent predictor of progression following radical
prostatectomy? A multivariate analysis of 185 clinical stage B
adenocarcinomas of the prostate with 5 years of followup.
J Urol. 1993 Jun;149(6):1478-81.
Abstract
| Related
citations
|
|
Ferrari MK, McNeal JE, Malhotra SM, Brooks JD.
Vascular
invasion predicts recurrence after radical prostatectomy: stratification of
risk based on pathologic variables.
Urology. 2004 Oct;64(4):749-53.
Abstract | Related
citations
|
|
|
Freedland SJ, Aronson W, Presti JC Jr, Kane CJ, Terris MK, Elashoff D,
Amling CL; SEARCH Database Study Group.
Should
a positive surgical margin following radical prostatectomy be pathological
stage T2 or T3? Results from the SEARCH database.
J Urol. 2003 Jun;169(6):2142-6.
Abstract
| Related
citations
|
|
|
Godoy G, Tareen BU, Lepor H.
Site
of positive surgical margins influences biochemical recurrence after radical
prostatectomy.
BJU Int. 2009 Dec;104(11):1610-4.
doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08688.x. Epub 2009 Jun 22.
Abstract | Full text | Related
citations
|
|
|
Karakiewicz PI, Eastham JA, Graefen M, Cagiannos I, Stricker PD, Klein E,
Cangiano T, Schröder FH, Scardino PT, Kattan MW.
Prognostic
impact of positive surgical margins in surgically treated prostate cancer:
multi-institutional assessment of 5831 patients.
Urology. 2005 Dec;66(6):1245-50.
Abstract
| Related
citations
|
|
Karazanashvili G, Gadaleanu V, Ahlgren G.
Vascular
invasion as a marker for prostate cancer recurrence after radical
prostatectomy.
European Urology Supplements, Volume 1, Issue 1, January 2002, Pages 67.
Abstract
Karazanashvili
et al. conclude that patients with vascular invasion in the radical
prostatectomy specimen are at high risk of recurrence after surgery, and
that adjuvant systemic treatment should be considered for these patients.
They further conclude that patients with negative surgical margins and no
vascular invasion are likely to be cured by radical prostatectomy. (La Roca
RL et al., 2014)
|
|
Ko J, Falzarano SM, Walker E, Streator Smith K, Stephenson AJ, Klein EA,
Magi-Galluzzi C.
Prostate
cancer patients older than 70 years treated by radical prostatectomy have
higher biochemical recurrence rate than their matched younger counterpart.
Prostate. 2013 Jun;73(8):897-903.
doi: 10.1002/pros.22635. Epub 2012 Dec 31.
Abstract | Related
citations
|
|
|
Obek C, Sadek S, Lai S, Civantos F, Rubinowicz D, Soloway MS.
Positive
surgical margins with radical retropubic prostatectomy: anatomic
site-specific pathologic analysis and impact on prognosis.
Urology. 1999 Oct;54(4):682-8.
Abstract
| Related
citations
|
|
|
Ohori M, Wheeler TM, Kattan MW, Goto Y, Scardino PT.
Prognostic
significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
J Urol. 1995 Nov;154(5):1818-24.
Abstract
| Related
citations
|
|
Palisaar RJ, Graefen M, Karakiewicz PI, Hammerer PG, Huland E, Haese A,
Fernandez S, Erbersdobler A, Henke RP, Huland H.
Assessment
of clinical and pathologic characteristics predisposing to disease
recurrence following radical prostatectomy in men with pathologically
organ-confined prostate cancer.
Eur Urol. 2002 Feb;41(2):155-61.
Abstract
| Related
citations
|
|
|
Pfitzenmaier J, Pahernik S, Tremmel T, Haferkamp A, Buse S, Hohenfellner M.
Positive
surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: do they have an impact on
biochemical or clinical progression?
BJU Int. 2008 Nov;102(10):1413-8.
doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07791.x. Epub 2008 Jun 4.
Abstract
| Related
citations
|
|
**
|
Rabbani F, Vora KC, Yunis LH, Eastham JA, Guillonneau B, Scardino PT,
Touijer K.
Biochemical
recurrence rate in patients with positive surgical margins at radical
prostatectomy with further negative resected tissue.
BJU Int. 2009 Sep;104(5):605-10.
doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08757.x. Epub 2009 Jul 7.
Abstract
| Full
text | Related
citations
|
|
Resnick MJ, Canter DJ, Guzzo TJ, Magerfleisch L, Tomaszewski JE, Brucker BM,
Bergey MR, Sonnad SS, Wein AJ, Malkowicz SB.
Defining
pathological variables to predict biochemical failure in patients with
positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy: implications for
adjuvant radiotherapy.
BJU Int. 2010 May;105(10):1377-80.
doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08953.x. Epub 2009 Nov 3.
Abstract
| Related
citations
|
|
Salomon L, Levrel O, Anastasiadis AG, Irani J, De La Taille A, Saint F,
Vordos D, Cicco A, Hoznek A, Chopin D, Abbou CC.
Prognostic
significance of tumor volume after radical prostatectomy: a multivariate
analysis of pathological prognostic factors.
Eur Urol. 2003 Jan;43(1):39-44.
Abstract
| Related
citations
|
|
|
Shikanov S, Marchetti P, Desai V, Razmaria A, Antic T, Al-Ahmadie H, Zagaja
G, Eggener S, Brendler C, Shalhav A.
Short
(≤ 1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence
after radical prostatectomy.
BJU Int. 2013 Apr;111(4):559-63.
doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11340.x. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
Abstract
| Related
citations
|
|
|
Shikanov S, Song J, Royce C, Al-Ahmadie H, Zorn K, Steinberg G, Zagaja G,
Shalhav A, Eggener S
Length
of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of
biochemical recurrence.
J Urol. 2009 Jul;182(1):139-44.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.139. Epub 2009 May 17.
Abstract
| Related
citations
|
|
|
Sofer M, Hamilton-Nelson KL, Civantos F, Soloway MS.
Positive
surgical margins after radical retropubic prostatectomy: the influence of
site and number on progression.
J Urol. 2002 Jun;167(6):2453-6.
Abstract
| Related
citations
|
|
Srougi
M,
Coelho
RF, Patel
VR.
Management
of Positive Surgical Margins Following Radical Prostatectomy.
Robotic
Urologic Surgery, 2012, pp
215-230, Epub 2011 Jun 17.
Abstract
|
|
Thompson IM 3rd, Salem S, Chang SS, Clark PE, Davis R, Herrell SD, Kordan Y,
Baumgartner R, Phillips S, Smith JA Jr, Cookson MS, Barocas DA.
Tumor
volume as a predictor of adverse pathologic features and biochemical
recurrence (BCR) in radical prostatectomy specimens: a tale of two methods.
World J Urol.
2011 Feb;29(1):15-20. doi: 10.1007/s00345-010-0611-x. Epub 2010 Nov 16.
Abstract
| Related
citations
|
|
Warner JN, Nunez RN, Mmeje CO, Colby TV, Ferrigni RG, Humphreys MR, Andrews
PE, Castle EP.
Impact
of margin status at 37 months after robot assisted radical prostatectomy.
Can J Urol.
2011 Dec;18(6):6043-9.
Abstract
| Related
citations
|
|
Wolters T, Roobol MJ, van Leeuwen PJ, van den Bergh RC, Hoedemaeker RF, van
Leenders GJ, Schröder FH, van der Kwast TH.
Should
pathologists routinely report prostate tumour volume? The prognostic value
of tumour volume in prostate cancer.
Eur Urol. 2010 May;57(5):821-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.07.027. Epub 2009 Jul 29.
Abstract
| Full
text | Related
citations
|
|
Yossepowitch O, Bjartell A, Eastham JA, Graefen M, Guillonneau BD,
Karakiewicz PI, Montironi R, Montorsi F.
Positive
surgical margins in radical prostatectomy: outlining the problem and its
long-term consequences.
Eur Urol. 2009 Jan;55(1):87-99.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.09.051. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
Abstract
| Full
text | Related
citations
|
|
|
|