Prostate Cancer Reports


Volume 2 Supplement 8
 August 2014
Home > Prostate Cancer Reports > Volume 2 - Year 2014 > Supplement 8, August 2014

CONTENTS

SPECIAL ISSUE ON RECURRENCE


Overall management
Prognosis and outcome
Recurrence





Berney DM, Wheeler TM, Grignon DJ, Epstein JI, Griffiths DF, Humphrey PA, van der Kwast T, Montironi R, Delahunt B, Egevad L, Srigley JR; ISUP Prostate Cancer Group.
International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 4: seminal vesicles and lymph nodes.
Mod Pathol. 2011 Jan;24(1):39-47. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2010.160. Epub 2010 Sep 3.
Abstract | Full text | Related citations


Egevad L, Srigley JR, Delahunt B.
International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens: rationale and organization.
Mod Pathol. 2011 Jan;24(1):1-5. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2010.159. Epub 2010 Aug 27.
Abstract | Full text | Related citations


Magi-Galluzzi C, Evans AJ, Delahunt B, Epstein JI, Griffiths DF, van der Kwast TH, Montironi R, Wheeler TM, Srigley JR, Egevad LL, Humphrey PA; ISUP Prostate Cancer Group.
International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 3: extraprostatic extension, lymphovascular invasion and locally advanced disease.
Mod Pathol. 2011 Jan;24(1):26-38. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2010.158. Epub 2010 Aug 27.
Abstract | Full text | Related citations


Samaratunga H, Montironi R, True L, Epstein JI, Griffiths DF, Humphrey PA, van der Kwast T, Wheeler TM, Srigley JR, Delahunt B, Egevad L; ISUP Prostate Cancer Group.
International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 1: specimen handling.
Mod Pathol. 2011 Jan;24(1):6-15. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2010.178. Epub 2010 Sep 10.
Abstract | Full text | Related citations


Tan PH, Cheng L, Srigley JR, Griffiths D, Humphrey PA, van der Kwast TH, Montironi R, Wheeler TM, Delahunt B, Egevad L, Epstein JI; ISUP Prostate Cancer Group.
International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 5: surgical margins.
Mod Pathol. 2011 Jan;24(1):48-57. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2010.155. Epub 2010 Aug 20.
Abstract | Full text | Related citations


The Royal College of Pathologists of Australia
ICCR Prostate Cancer (Radical Prostatectomy) bookmarked guide
2011 http://www.rcpa.edu.au/Library/Practising-Pathology/ICCR/Cancer-Datasets.
Abstract | Full text


van der Kwast TH, Amin MB, Billis A, Epstein JI, Griffiths D, Humphrey PA, Montironi R, Wheeler TM, Srigley JR, Egevad L, Delahunt B; ISUP Prostate Cancer Group.
International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 2: T2 substaging and prostate cancer volume.
Mod Pathol. 2011 Jan;24(1):16-25. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2010.156. Epub 2010 Sep 3.
Abstract | Full text | Related citations



Nomograms

Makarov DV, Trock BJ, Humphreys EB, Mangold LA, Walsh PC, Epstein JI, Partin AW.
Updated nomogram to predict pathologic stage of prostate cancer given prostate-specific antigen level, clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason score (Partin tables) based on cases from 2000 to 2005.
Urology. 2007 Jun;69(6):1095-101.
Abstract | Full text | Comment | Related citations




Alkhateeb S, Alibhai S, Fleshner N, Finelli A, Jewett M, Zlotta A, Nesbitt M, Lockwood G, Trachtenberg J.
Impact of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy differs by disease risk group.
J Urol. 2010 Jan;183(1):145-50. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.132. Epub 2009 Nov 13.
Abstract | Related citations

Gleason score 7

Brimo F, Partin AW, Epstein JI.
Tumor grade at margins of resection in radical prostatectomy specimens is an independent predictor of prognosis.
Urology. 2010 Nov;76(5):1206-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.03.090. Epub 2010 Aug 8.
Abstract | Related citations



Blute ML, Bostwick DG, Bergstralh EJ, Slezak JM, Martin SK, Amling CL, Zincke H.
Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy.
Urology. 1997 Nov;50(5):733-9.
Abstract | Related citations


Cho IC, Kwon WA, Kim JE, Joung JY, Seo HK, Chung J, Park WS, Lee KH.
Prostate volume has prognostic value only in pathologic T2 radical prostatectomy specimens.
J Korean Med Sci. 2011 Jun;26(6):807-13. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2011.26.6.807. Epub 2011 May 18.
Abstract | Full text | Related citations


Choo MS, Cho SY, Ko K, Jeong CW, Lee SB, Ku JH, Hong SK, Byun SS, Kwak C, Kim HH, Lee SE, Jeong H.
Impact of positive surgical margins and their locations after radical prostatectomy: comparison of biochemical recurrence according to risk stratification and surgical modality.
World J Urol. 2013 Dec 21. [Epub ahead of print]
Abstract | Related citations


D'Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, Schultz D, Schnall M, Tomaszewski JE, Wein A.
A multivariate analysis of clinical and pathological factors that predict for prostate specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
J Urol. 1995 Jul;154(1):131-8.
Abstract | Related citations


D'Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, Schnall M, Tomaszewski J, Schultz D, Kao G, VanArsdalen K, Wein A.
A multivariable analysis of clinical factors predicting for pathological features associated with local failure after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994 Sep 30;30(2):293-302.
Abstract | Related citations


Epstein JI, Carmichael M, Partin AW, Walsh PC.
Is tumor volume an independent predictor of progression following radical prostatectomy? A multivariate analysis of 185 clinical stage B adenocarcinomas of the prostate with 5 years of followup.
J Urol. 1993 Jun;149(6):1478-81.
Abstract | Related citations


Ferrari MK, McNeal JE, Malhotra SM, Brooks JD.
Vascular invasion predicts recurrence after radical prostatectomy: stratification of risk based on pathologic variables.
Urology. 2004 Oct;64(4):749-53.
Abstract | Related citations



Freedland SJ, Aronson W, Presti JC Jr, Kane CJ, Terris MK, Elashoff D, Amling CL; SEARCH Database Study Group.
Should a positive surgical margin following radical prostatectomy be pathological stage T2 or T3? Results from the SEARCH database.
J Urol. 2003 Jun;169(6):2142-6.
Abstract | Related citations



Godoy G, Tareen BU, Lepor H.
Site of positive surgical margins influences biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
BJU Int. 2009 Dec;104(11):1610-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08688.x. Epub 2009 Jun 22.
Abstract | Full text | Related citations



Karakiewicz PI, Eastham JA, Graefen M, Cagiannos I, Stricker PD, Klein E, Cangiano T, Schröder FH, Scardino PT, Kattan MW.
Prognostic impact of positive surgical margins in surgically treated prostate cancer: multi-institutional assessment of 5831 patients.
Urology. 2005 Dec;66(6):1245-50.
Abstract | Related citations


Karazanashvili G, Gadaleanu V, Ahlgren G.
Vascular invasion as a marker for prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
European Urology Supplements, Volume 1, Issue 1, January 2002, Pages 67.
Abstract
Karazanashvili et al. conclude that patients with vascular invasion in the radical prostatectomy specimen are at high risk of recurrence after surgery, and that adjuvant systemic treatment should be considered for these patients. They further conclude that patients with negative surgical margins and no vascular invasion are likely to be cured by radical prostatectomy. (La Roca RL et al., 2014)


Ko J, Falzarano SM, Walker E, Streator Smith K, Stephenson AJ, Klein EA, Magi-Galluzzi C.
Prostate cancer patients older than 70 years treated by radical prostatectomy have higher biochemical recurrence rate than their matched younger counterpart.
Prostate. 2013 Jun;73(8):897-903. doi: 10.1002/pros.22635. Epub 2012 Dec 31.
Abstract | Related citations



Obek C, Sadek S, Lai S, Civantos F, Rubinowicz D, Soloway MS.
Positive surgical margins with radical retropubic prostatectomy: anatomic site-specific pathologic analysis and impact on prognosis.
Urology. 1999 Oct;54(4):682-8.
Abstract | Related citations



Ohori M, Wheeler TM, Kattan MW, Goto Y, Scardino PT.
Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
J Urol. 1995 Nov;154(5):1818-24.
Abstract | Related citations


Palisaar RJ, Graefen M, Karakiewicz PI, Hammerer PG, Huland E, Haese A, Fernandez S, Erbersdobler A, Henke RP, Huland H.
Assessment of clinical and pathologic characteristics predisposing to disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy in men with pathologically organ-confined prostate cancer.
Eur Urol. 2002 Feb;41(2):155-61.
Abstract | Related citations



Pfitzenmaier J, Pahernik S, Tremmel T, Haferkamp A, Buse S, Hohenfellner M.
Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: do they have an impact on biochemical or clinical progression?
BJU Int. 2008 Nov;102(10):1413-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07791.x. Epub 2008 Jun 4.
Abstract | Related citations

**

Rabbani F, Vora KC, Yunis LH, Eastham JA, Guillonneau B, Scardino PT, Touijer K.
Biochemical recurrence rate in patients with positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy with further negative resected tissue.
BJU Int. 2009 Sep;104(5):605-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08757.x. Epub 2009 Jul 7.
Abstract | Full text | Related citations


Resnick MJ, Canter DJ, Guzzo TJ, Magerfleisch L, Tomaszewski JE, Brucker BM, Bergey MR, Sonnad SS, Wein AJ, Malkowicz SB.
Defining pathological variables to predict biochemical failure in patients with positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy: implications for adjuvant radiotherapy.
BJU Int. 2010 May;105(10):1377-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08953.x. Epub 2009 Nov 3.
Abstract | Related citations


Salomon L, Levrel O, Anastasiadis AG, Irani J, De La Taille A, Saint F, Vordos D, Cicco A, Hoznek A, Chopin D, Abbou CC.
Prognostic significance of tumor volume after radical prostatectomy: a multivariate analysis of pathological prognostic factors.
Eur Urol. 2003 Jan;43(1):39-44.
Abstract | Related citations



Shikanov S, Marchetti P, Desai V, Razmaria A, Antic T, Al-Ahmadie H, Zagaja G, Eggener S, Brendler C, Shalhav A.
Short (≤ 1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
BJU Int. 2013 Apr;111(4):559-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11340.x. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
Abstract | Related citations



Shikanov S, Song J, Royce C, Al-Ahmadie H, Zorn K, Steinberg G, Zagaja G, Shalhav A, Eggener S
Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence.
J Urol. 2009 Jul;182(1):139-44. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.139. Epub 2009 May 17.
Abstract | Related citations



Sofer M, Hamilton-Nelson KL, Civantos F, Soloway MS.
Positive surgical margins after radical retropubic prostatectomy: the influence of site and number on progression.
J Urol. 2002 Jun;167(6):2453-6.
Abstract | Related citations


Srougi M, Coelho RF, Patel VR.
Management of Positive Surgical Margins Following Radical Prostatectomy.
Robotic Urologic Surgery, 2012, pp 215-230, Epub 2011 Jun 17.
Abstract


Thompson IM 3rd, Salem S, Chang SS, Clark PE, Davis R, Herrell SD, Kordan Y, Baumgartner R, Phillips S, Smith JA Jr, Cookson MS, Barocas DA.
Tumor volume as a predictor of adverse pathologic features and biochemical recurrence (BCR) in radical prostatectomy specimens: a tale of two methods.
World J Urol. 2011 Feb;29(1):15-20. doi: 10.1007/s00345-010-0611-x. Epub 2010 Nov 16.
Abstract | Related citations


Warner JN, Nunez RN, Mmeje CO, Colby TV, Ferrigni RG, Humphreys MR, Andrews PE, Castle EP.
Impact of margin status at 37 months after robot assisted radical prostatectomy.
Can J Urol. 2011 Dec;18(6):6043-9.
Abstract | Related citations


Wolters T, Roobol MJ, van Leeuwen PJ, van den Bergh RC, Hoedemaeker RF, van Leenders GJ, Schröder FH, van der Kwast TH.
Should pathologists routinely report prostate tumour volume? The prognostic value of tumour volume in prostate cancer.
Eur Urol. 2010 May;57(5):821-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.07.027. Epub 2009 Jul 29.
Abstract | Full text | Related citations


Yossepowitch O, Bjartell A, Eastham JA, Graefen M, Guillonneau BD, Karakiewicz PI, Montironi R, Montorsi F.
Positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy: outlining the problem and its long-term consequences.
Eur Urol. 2009 Jan;55(1):87-99. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.09.051. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
Abstract | Full text | Related citations